PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSL vs. ONEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSL vs. ONEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than ONEO's 17.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed ONEO with an annualized return of 7.88%, while ONEO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


PSL

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
9.10%
6M
9.15%
1Y
-1.02%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
7.88%

ONEO

1D
0.19%
1M
6.36%
YTD
17.85%
6M
18.38%
1Y
27.50%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSL vs. ONEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
9.10%-3.47%15.42%12.32%-7.76%6.88%18.15%14.16%0.92%21.82%
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.85%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PSL and ONEO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.69

The correlation between PSL and ONEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSL vs. ONEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSL
ONEO

Consumer Defensive

85.9%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
11.6%

Financial Services

1.8%
9.4%

Industrials

1.5%
18.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.7%

Communication Services

-

3.6%

Energy

-

7.3%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

21.9%

Utilities

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSL
85.9%
ONEO
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSL
10.9%
ONEO
11.6%

Financial Services

PSL
1.8%
ONEO
9.4%

Industrials

PSL
1.5%
ONEO
18.0%

Basic Materials

PSL

-

ONEO
4.7%

Communication Services

PSL

-

ONEO
3.6%

Energy

PSL

-

ONEO
7.3%

Healthcare

PSL

-

ONEO
9.5%

Real Estate

PSL

-

ONEO
2.9%

Technology

PSL

-

ONEO
21.9%

Utilities

PSL

-

ONEO
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSL vs. ONEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSL
PSL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSL vs. ONEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLONEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.38

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

3.75

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

14.86

-15.03

PSL vs. ONEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the ONEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSL and ONEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLONEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

2.16

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.61

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.64

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.63

-0.08

Drawdowns

PSL vs. ONEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEO drawdown of -40.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and ONEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLONEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-40.86%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-7.37%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.64%

-19.72%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-22.39%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.67%

-40.86%

+6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.41%

0.00%

-6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-5.00%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

1.86%

+4.23%

Volatility

PSL vs. ONEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLONEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.77%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

9.66%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.84%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

17.22%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

18.66%

-2.16%

PSL vs. ONEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSL vs. ONEO - Dividend Comparison

PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ONEO's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
PSL
Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF
0.84%0.93%0.60%1.37%1.98%1.24%0.80%0.47%0.75%0.34%2.08%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSL and ONEO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEO has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs ONEO's -40.86%.

On 10-year performance, ONEO leads with 11.94% vs 7.88% for PSL. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.84% for PSL.

PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.20% for ONEO.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSL and ONEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer