PSL vs. FMTM
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. PSL is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, PSL returned -1.02% vs 63.62% for FMTM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.
Performance
PSL vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.
PSL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- -1.02%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
FMTM
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 34.74%
- 1Y
- 63.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSL vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 9.10% | -3.40% |
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 31.75% | 27.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and FMTM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
FMTM
PSL vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSL | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.46 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 5.28 | -5.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.17 | 20.62 | -20.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSL | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 2.80 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 2.38 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
PSL vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and FMTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -12.12% | -29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -12.12% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | 0.00% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -1.89% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.09% | 3.10% | +2.99% |
Volatility
PSL vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | FMTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 6.52% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.51% | 17.83% | -9.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 22.82% | -10.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 22.94% | -7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 22.94% | -6.44% |
PSL vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and FMTM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs FMTM's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs -1.02% for PSL. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs -1.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.
Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.45% for FMTM.
FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and FMTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer