PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSK vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSK vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSK achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PSK has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 2.10%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


PSK

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
2.10%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSK vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
-0.35%2.69%4.81%8.91%-18.86%1.57%6.37%17.59%-4.54%12.44%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PSK and XLU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2009

0.29

The correlation between PSK and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSK vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSK
XLU

Financial Services

66.9%

-

Utilities

9.5%
100.0%

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Industrials

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

PSK
66.9%
XLU

-

Utilities

PSK
9.5%
XLU
100.0%

Real Estate

PSK
4.8%
XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSK
1.8%
XLU

-

Communication Services

PSK
1.6%
XLU

-

Industrials

PSK
0.8%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

PSK

-

XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

PSK

-

XLU

-

Energy

PSK

-

XLU

-

Healthcare

PSK

-

XLU

-

Technology

PSK

-

XLU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSK vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSK
PSK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSK vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSKXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.00

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

2.24

-0.41

PSK vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSK and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSKXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.63

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.54

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.48

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.40

+0.04

Drawdowns

PSK vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSK drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSK and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSKXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.10%

-51.98%

+21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-9.18%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-17.26%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.23%

-25.26%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.10%

-36.07%

+5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-7.78%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-10.22%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.09%

-1.60%

Volatility

PSK vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) is 1.65%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that PSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSKXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

5.41%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

11.53%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

14.57%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

17.32%

-6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

19.26%

-7.35%

PSK vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSK vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

PSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
7.04%6.82%6.55%6.44%6.55%5.03%5.08%5.44%6.47%6.91%5.92%5.35%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSK and XLU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to PSK (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSK dropped -30.10% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.15% vs 2.10% for PSK. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSK has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.15% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSK.

PSK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 2.72% for XLU.

PSK is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XLU is Utilities Equities. PSK tracks PSK-US - ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed& Adjustable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PSK and 0.08% for XLU.

PSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSK and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer