PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSK vs. SPFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSK vs. SPFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSK achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than SPFF's 6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PSK has underperformed SPFF with an annualized return of 2.10%, while SPFF has yielded a comparatively higher 3.13% annualized return.


PSK

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.54%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
3.10%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
2.10%

SPFF

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
8.28%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSK vs. SPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
-0.35%2.69%4.81%8.91%-18.86%1.57%6.37%17.59%-4.54%12.44%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.91%7.52%8.62%3.00%-14.29%5.15%6.91%13.04%-2.55%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PSK and SPFF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.67

The correlation between PSK and SPFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSK vs. SPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSK
SPFF

Financial Services

66.9%
54.4%

Utilities

9.5%
14.2%

Real Estate

4.8%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.6%
2.0%

Industrials

0.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Technology

-

18.3%

Financial Services

PSK
66.9%
SPFF
54.4%

Utilities

PSK
9.5%
SPFF
14.2%

Real Estate

PSK
4.8%
SPFF
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSK
1.8%
SPFF
3.0%

Communication Services

PSK
1.6%
SPFF
2.0%

Industrials

PSK
0.8%
SPFF
1.8%

Basic Materials

PSK

-

SPFF
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSK

-

SPFF

-

Energy

PSK

-

SPFF

-

Healthcare

PSK

-

SPFF
3.2%

Technology

PSK

-

SPFF
18.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSK vs. SPFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSK
PSK Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPFF
SPFF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SPFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPFF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPFF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSK vs. SPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) and Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSKSPFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.96

-1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

2.79

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.45

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.83

7.46

-5.63

PSK vs. SPFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SPFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSK and SPFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSKSPFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.96

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.20

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.23

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.30

+0.14

Drawdowns

PSK vs. SPFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSK drawdown since its inception was -30.10%, smaller than the maximum SPFF drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSK and SPFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSKSPFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.10%

-35.92%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-7.58%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-12.51%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.23%

-22.88%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.10%

-35.92%

+5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-0.20%

-5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-4.06%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.49%

0.00%

Volatility

PSK vs. SPFF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF (PSK) is 1.65%, while Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that PSK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSKSPFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

2.97%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

7.29%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

9.53%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

10.93%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.91%

13.51%

-1.60%

PSK vs. SPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPFF's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSK vs. SPFF - Dividend Comparison

PSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than SPFF's 6.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSK
SPDR ICE Preferred Securities ETF
7.04%6.82%6.55%6.44%6.55%5.03%5.08%5.44%6.47%6.91%5.92%5.35%
SPFF
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF
6.34%6.47%6.39%6.64%7.15%5.78%5.75%5.97%7.60%7.24%7.04%7.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSK and SPFF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPFF has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to PSK (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSK dropped -30.10% vs SPFF's -35.92%.

On 10-year performance, SPFF leads with 3.13% vs 2.10% for PSK. On fees, PSK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PSK has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPFF has performed better with a 3.13% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SPFF.

PSK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 6.34% for SPFF.

PSK tracks PSK-US - ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed& Adjustable Rate Preferred Securities Index, while SPFF tracks S&P Enhanced Yield North American Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PSK and 0.58% for SPFF.

SPFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSK and SPFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer