PSIL vs. TRUH
PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
PSIL vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PSIL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 40.80%
- YTD
- 36.87%
- 1Y
- 60.42%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.56%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $992.95K | $1.18M | $917.29K | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
PSIL vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 35.14% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSIL and TRUH is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIL vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
PSIL
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSIL vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSIL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSIL vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -4.51% | -88.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.38% | -2.75% | -70.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.64% | -1.64% | -75.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility
PSIL vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIL | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.73% | 17.62% | +23.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.54% | 17.62% | +44.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.54% | 17.62% | +44.92% |
PSIL vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSIL vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 7.25% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL and TRUH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for PSIL and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer