PSIL vs. PBPH
PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSIL is actively managed, while PBPH is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
PSIL vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's -1.13% return.
PSIL
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 65.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSIL vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 20.15% | 4.56% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.13% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSIL and PBPH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIL vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
PSIL
PBPH
PSIL vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSIL | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSIL | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.04 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PSIL vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIL | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -11.10% | -81.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.63% | -8.69% | -67.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.76% | -4.23% | -72.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.63% | — | — |
Volatility
PSIL vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIL | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.80% | 16.78% | +25.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 16.78% | +46.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 16.78% | +46.37% |
PSIL vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSIL vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 8.32% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL and PBPH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for PSIL and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer