PSIL vs. PBPH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSIL is actively managed, while PBPH is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.

Performance

PSIL vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 41.35% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 7.57% return.

PSIL

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 23.98%
• 6M: 40.74%
• YTD: 41.35%
• 1Y: 75.30%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBPH

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 5.78%
• 6M: 6.38%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	41.35%	5.67%
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF	7.57%	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIL and PBPH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

PSIL vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL

PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 67
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

PBPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSIL	PBPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.70	—	—

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and PBPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSIL	PBPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.72%	-11.10%	-81.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.51%	-3.16%	-69.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.67%	-4.15%	-72.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSIL	PBPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.43%	17.85%	+23.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.79%	17.85%	+44.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.79%	17.85%	+44.94%

PSIL vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSIL vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than PBPH's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF	0.08%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF	7.02%	10.95%	1.49%	0.24%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSIL and PBPH in my portfolio?

PSIL and PBPH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSIL or PBPH?

On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSIL or PBPH?

PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSIL or PBPH?

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.08% for PBPH.

What is the main difference between PSIL and PBPH?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.13% for PBPH.