PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIL vs. MLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIL vs. MLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than MLI's 20.69% return.


PSIL

1D
-4.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
12.35%
6M
10.46%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
10Y*

MLI

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.23%
YTD
20.69%
6M
20.88%
1Y
87.45%
3Y*
52.10%
5Y*
45.38%
10Y*
26.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
12.35%74.55%-19.50%-25.12%-67.24%-42.72%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
20.69%46.29%70.51%62.38%1.05%37.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIL and MLI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.28

The correlation between PSIL and MLI shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIL vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL
PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MLI
MLI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSILMLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.50

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.94

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

10.92

-5.54

PSIL vs. MLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the MLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIL and MLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than MLI's maximum drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and MLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSILMLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.72%

-61.72%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-22.33%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.62%

-27.79%

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.15%

-1.93%

-76.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.71%

-16.04%

-60.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.81%

8.03%

+1.78%

Volatility

PSIL vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) at 10.51%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSILMLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

10.51%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.74%

25.79%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.53%

30.06%

+12.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.03%

33.07%

+29.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.03%

35.79%

+27.24%

Dividends

PSIL vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, more than MLI's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.87%0.87%1.01%1.27%1.69%0.88%1.14%1.26%1.71%9.60%0.94%1.11%
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
8.90%10.95%1.49%0.24%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSIL and MLI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIL has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to MLI (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs MLI's -61.72%.

MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIL and MLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer