PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PSIL vs. IXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PSIL vs. IXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSIL is actively managed, while IXJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSIL returned 9.55%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for IXJ. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXJ.

Performance

PSIL vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ's -5.26% return.

PSIL

1D
-2.57%
1M
1.88%
YTD
20.15%
6M
23.74%
1Y
65.52%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF		20.15%74.55%-19.50%-25.12%-67.24%-41.98%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF		-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIL and IXJ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021

0.28

PSIL vs. IXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
PSIL
IXJ

Healthcare

100.0%
98.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PSIL
100.0%
IXJ
98.9%

Basic Materials

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Communication Services

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

PSIL

-

IXJ
0.5%

Energy

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Financial Services

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Industrials

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Real Estate

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Technology

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Utilities

PSIL

-

IXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF

iShares Global Healthcare ETF

Often compared with PSIL:
PSIL vs. XLVPSIL vs. XHEPSIL vs. AADRPSIL vs. FMEDPSIL vs. IBBPSIL vs. VHTPSIL vs. SPAQ
Often compared with IXJ:
IXJ vs. XLVIXJ vs. VHTIXJ vs. XDWH.LIXJ vs. IHIIXJ vs. FHLCIXJ vs. IVVIXJ vs. HLTH.L

Return for Risk

PSIL vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PSIL
PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PSILIXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.58
0.64

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.14
1.06

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.12

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

0.87

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

2.11

+4.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSIL vs. IXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the IXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIL and IXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PSILIXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

0.64

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.28

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.49

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.42

-0.83

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than IXJ's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and IXJ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PSILIXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.72%

-40.60%

-52.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-10.78%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.62%

-18.14%

-46.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.14%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.35%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.63%

-9.27%

-67.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.76%

-6.92%

-69.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.63%

4.41%

+5.22%

Volatility

PSIL vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 3.75%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PSILIXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

3.75%

+6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

10.05%

+17.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.80%

14.55%

+27.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.15%

14.21%

+48.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.15%

15.67%

+47.48%

PSIL vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IXJ's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSIL vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than IXJ's 1.47% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF		1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF		8.32%10.95%1.49%0.24%2.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PSIL and IXJ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIL has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to IXJ (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs IXJ's -40.60%.

On 3-year performance, PSIL leads with 9.55% vs 4.42% for IXJ. On fees, IXJ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXJ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 1.47% for IXJ.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.46% for IXJ.

PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIL and IXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer