PSIL vs. BILZ
PSIL (AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PSIL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSIL returned 65.52% vs 3.91% for BILZ. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PSIL charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.
Performance
PSIL vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.47% return.
PSIL
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 20.15%
- 6M
- 23.74%
- 1Y
- 65.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSIL vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 20.15% | 74.55% | -19.50% | -27.08% |
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.47% | 4.21% | 5.25% | 2.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSIL and BILZ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSIL vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank
PSIL
BILZ
PSIL vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSIL | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -123.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 53.31 | -52.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 198.55 | -195.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 2,000.92 | -1,994.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSIL | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 19.09 | -17.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 10.48 | -10.90 |
Drawdowns
PSIL vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and BILZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSIL | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.72% | -0.52% | -92.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -0.02% | -20.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.63% | 0.00% | -76.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.76% | -0.01% | -76.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.63% | 0.00% | +9.63% |
Volatility
PSIL vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSIL | BILZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 0.07% | +9.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 0.14% | +27.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.80% | 0.21% | +41.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 0.43% | +62.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.15% | 0.43% | +62.72% |
PSIL vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSIL vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison
PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than BILZ's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 4.07% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
PSIL AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF | 8.32% | 10.95% | 1.49% | 0.24% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSIL and BILZ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSIL has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs BILZ's -0.52%.
On 1-year performance, PSIL leads with 65.52% vs 3.91% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSIL has performed better with a 65.52% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.
PSIL has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 4.07% for BILZ.
PSIL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.14% for BILZ.
BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.09 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSIL and BILZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer