PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIL vs. ALKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIL vs. ALKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Alkermes plc (ALKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than ALKS's 58.54% return.


PSIL

1D
-4.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
12.35%
6M
10.46%
1Y
52.66%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
10Y*

ALKS

1D
0.18%
1M
18.36%
YTD
58.54%
6M
57.47%
1Y
48.71%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
0.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. ALKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
12.35%74.55%-19.50%-25.12%-67.24%-42.72%
ALKS
Alkermes plc
58.54%-2.71%3.68%6.16%12.34%-24.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIL and ALKS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIL vs. ALKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL
PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

ALKS
ALKS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ALKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALKS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALKS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. ALKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and Alkermes plc (ALKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSILALKSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.21

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.38

5.11

+0.27

PSIL vs. ALKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the ALKS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIL and ALKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. ALKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ALKS drawdown of -96.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and ALKS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSILALKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.72%

-96.14%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

-22.20%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.62%

-31.58%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.15%

-54.76%

-23.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.71%

-67.23%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.81%

9.55%

+0.26%

Volatility

PSIL vs. ALKS - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Alkermes plc (ALKS) at 10.43%. This indicates that PSIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSILALKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

10.43%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.74%

30.28%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.53%

40.79%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.03%

37.33%

+25.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.03%

41.31%

+21.72%

Dividends

PSIL vs. ALKS - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, while ALKS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ALKS
Alkermes plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
8.90%10.95%1.49%0.24%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSIL and ALKS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIL has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to ALKS (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIL dropped -92.72% vs ALKS's -96.14%.

PSIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIL and ALKS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer