PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIAX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PSIAX having a 11.48% return and BKTSX slightly higher at 11.73%. Over the past 10 years, PSIAX has outperformed BKTSX with an annualized return of 16.41%, while BKTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.


PSIAX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.48%
6M
11.47%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
16.41%

BKTSX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.68%
YTD
11.73%
6M
11.61%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSIAX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A
11.48%17.27%28.56%25.69%-18.68%15.75%17.96%57.65%-5.24%21.27%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
11.73%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIAX and BKTSX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.98

The correlation between PSIAX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIAX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIAX
PSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSIAXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.34

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

15.37

-0.18

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIAX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSIAXBKTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.44

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.76

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.82

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.83

-0.40

Drawdowns

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIAX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than BKTSX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIAX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIAXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.50%

-34.97%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-8.87%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-19.29%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.76%

-24.98%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-34.97%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-4.53%

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIAXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.94%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

9.13%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

12.15%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.36%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

18.41%

+1.20%

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIAX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSIAX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

PSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than BKTSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.04%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
PSIAX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A
7.56%8.43%7.63%13.35%16.13%0.86%28.04%34.42%23.26%6.01%3.61%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PSIAX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKTSX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to PSIAX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIAX dropped -55.50% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

PSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIAX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer