PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSI vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSI vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 93.40% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has outperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 33.31%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.


PSI

1D
5.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
93.40%
6M
86.01%
1Y
182.03%
3Y*
52.78%
5Y*
30.45%
10Y*
33.31%

FLOT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.15%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
3.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSI vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
93.40%36.32%17.17%49.06%-34.43%46.55%56.75%52.49%-11.55%40.16%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.87%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PSI and FLOT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.11

The correlation between PSI and FLOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSI vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSI
PSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSI vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSIFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

3.22

-1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.84

11.27

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.10

104.83

-62.73

PSI vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSI Sharpe Ratio is 4.64, which is comparable to the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSI and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSIFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64

6.54

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

2.38

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.73

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.66

-0.08

Drawdowns

PSI vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.96%

-13.54%

-49.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.48%

-0.43%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.07%

-1.57%

-39.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.85%

-2.36%

-42.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.85%

-13.54%

-31.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.89%

-0.02%

-6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.93%

-0.21%

-15.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

0.05%

+4.29%

Volatility

PSI vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.20%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.07%

0.20%

+17.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.42%

0.62%

+31.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.52%

0.75%

+38.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.19%

1.77%

+36.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.29%

4.15%

+31.14%

PSI vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSI vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FLOT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.54%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
PSI
Invesco Semiconductors ETF
0.05%0.10%0.15%0.40%0.61%0.14%0.21%0.52%0.83%0.21%0.68%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSI and FLOT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSI has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to FLOT (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSI dropped -62.96% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 33.31% vs 3.03% for FLOT. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 33.31% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.05% for PSI.

PSI is categorized as Semiconductors, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PSI and 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 4.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSI and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer