PSFO vs. PTNQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSFO (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. PSFO is actively managed, while PTNQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSFO returned 13.19%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for PTNQ. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSFO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.

Performance

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFO achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than PTNQ's 14.10% return.

PSFO

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.42%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 7.21%
• 1Y: 17.64%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PTNQ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.71%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 12.48%
• 1Y: 33.00%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: 16.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSFO Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF	6.62%	12.93%	10.78%	20.03%	-0.34%	4.75%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	14.10%	7.18%	15.47%	34.65%	-16.00%	5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFO and PTNQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021	0.80

The correlation between PSFO and PTNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (3 years) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSFO	PTNQ
Technology	36.2%	53.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.3%
Communication Services	10.9%	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	5.3%
Industrials	8.1%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.8%
Energy	3.5%	0.5%
Utilities	2.3%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.1%

Return for Risk

PSFO vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFO

PSFO Risk / Return Rank: 77
PSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PTNQ

PTNQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
PTNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PTNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PTNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PTNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PTNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFO	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.13	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	2.80	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.36	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.82	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.51	9.57	+6.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the PTNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFO and PTNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFO	PTNQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.13	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.81	+0.35

Drawdowns

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFO drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFO and PTNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFO	PTNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.09%	-28.07%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.20%	-11.76%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.09%	-14.19%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-0.20%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-5.69%	+3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	3.46%	-2.39%

Volatility

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) is 1.05%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that PSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFO	PTNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	4.63%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.49%	11.48%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	15.56%	-8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.05%	12.90%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.05%	16.37%	-6.32%

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFO vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison

PSFO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSFO Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF	0.77%	0.88%	1.96%	1.47%	0.62%	0.00%	0.16%	0.44%	0.45%	0.32%	0.30%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFO and PTNQ in my portfolio?

PSFO and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSFO or PTNQ?

PTNQ has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to PSFO (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFO dropped -12.09% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.

Which ETF is better, PSFO or PTNQ?

On 3-year performance, PTNQ leads with 15.46% vs 13.19% for PSFO. On fees, PSFO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFO has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSFO or PTNQ?

Over the 3-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFO or PTNQ?

PSFO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFO or PTNQ?

PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for PSFO.

What is the main difference between PSFO and PTNQ?

PSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSFO and 0.65% for PTNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.