PSFO vs. PTNQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ).
PSFO and PTNQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSFO is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021. PTNQ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2015.
Performance
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFO Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF | -2.20% | 12.93% | 10.78% | 20.03% | -0.34% | 4.75% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | -6.66% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 5.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFO achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's -6.66% return.
PSFO
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.66%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSFO vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSFO
PTNQ
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFO | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.27 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.45 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.06 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.36 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 1.06 | +7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFO | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.27 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.69 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFO and PTNQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
PSFO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFO Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFO drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFO and PTNQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFO | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.09% | -28.07% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -11.76% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -9.74% | +6.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -5.74% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 4.05% | -2.48% |
Volatility
PSFO vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) is 3.72%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that PSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSFO | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 5.77% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.99% | 12.61% | -6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 15.32% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 12.71% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 16.30% | -6.13% |