PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFO vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFO vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFO achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return.


PSFO

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
5.92%
6M
5.46%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFO vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSFO
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF
5.92%12.93%10.78%20.03%-0.34%4.84%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFO and SPY is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.92

The correlation between PSFO and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFO vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFO
PSFO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFO vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSFOSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.67

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

11.92

+2.91

PSFO vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFO and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSFO vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFO drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFO and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFOSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-55.19%

+43.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-8.88%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-18.76%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-3.17%

+2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-9.04%

+7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

1.98%

-0.89%

Volatility

PSFO vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF (PSFO) is 2.03%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that PSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFOSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

4.87%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.69%

9.85%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

12.50%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.03%

17.15%

-7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

17.95%

-7.92%

PSFO vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFO vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

PSFO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSFO
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PSFO and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to PSFO (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFO dropped -12.09% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 3-year performance, SPY leads with 20.68% vs 12.39% for PSFO. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PSFO has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPY has performed better with a 20.68% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSFO.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for PSFO.

PSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSFO and 0.09% for SPY.

PSFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFO and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer