PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFM vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSFM vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSFM vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSFM
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
2.20%7.28%14.18%18.32%-5.23%11.65%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
3.91%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%16.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFM achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 3.91% return.


PSFM

1D
0.29%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.20%
6M
4.25%
1Y
13.43%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
10Y*

COWZ

1D
-0.37%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
3.91%
6M
9.24%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSFM vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSFM vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFM
PSFM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PSFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFM vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFMCOWZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

0.96

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

1.43

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

1.20

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.66

5.59

+5.07

PSFM vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFM Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFM and COWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFMCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.96

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.63

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PSFM and COWZ is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PSFM vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

PSFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSFM
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.07%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%

Drawdowns

PSFM vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFM drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFM and COWZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFMCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-38.63%

+24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.58%

-13.55%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.72%

+3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-4.85%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.92%

-1.64%

Volatility

PSFM vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) is 1.71%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that PSFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSFMCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

2.96%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

8.37%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

17.50%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.65%

17.73%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.65%

20.08%

-9.43%