PSFJ vs. NVDO
PSFJ (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFJ achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
PSFJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSFJ Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF | 5.52% | 4.33% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFJ and NVDO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFJ vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
PSFJ
NVDO
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF (PSFJ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFJ drawdown since its inception was -12.20%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFJ and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.20% | -16.25% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -2.68% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -4.99% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFJ | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 31.93% | -25.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 31.93% | -21.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 31.93% | -21.57% |
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFJ vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
PSFJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
PSFJ Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFJ and NVDO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSFJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSFJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for PSFJ.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFJ and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for PSFJ and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer