PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HPI vs. HPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HPI vs. HPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HPI achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than HPS's 3.62% return. Over the past 10 years, HPI has underperformed HPS with an annualized return of 4.83%, while HPS has yielded a comparatively higher 5.25% annualized return.


HPI

1D
-0.68%
1M
1.22%
YTD
3.15%
6M
1.86%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
4.83%

HPS

1D
-1.25%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
3.62%
6M
3.05%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HPI vs. HPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HPI
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
3.15%6.54%14.95%8.34%-15.79%13.16%-7.02%30.89%-4.79%13.78%
HPS
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III
3.62%4.86%15.65%7.66%-16.56%16.44%-3.00%31.43%-8.37%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HPI and HPS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003

0.68

The correlation between HPI and HPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HPI vs. HPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HPI
HPI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPI Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPI Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HPS
HPS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HPI vs. HPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HPIHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

3.79

-0.42

HPI vs. HPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the HPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HPI and HPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HPI vs. HPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HPI drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, roughly equal to the maximum HPS drawdown of -70.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HPI and HPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HPIHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.67%

-70.04%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-7.61%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-17.58%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.10%

-29.39%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.99%

-52.12%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-3.32%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-8.36%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.90%

+0.50%

Volatility

HPI vs. HPS - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Preferred Income Fund (HPI) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III (HPS) at 2.44%. This indicates that HPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HPIHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.44%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.48%

7.27%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.10%

9.71%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

15.67%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

21.47%

+2.85%

HPI vs. HPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HPI and HPS have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HPI vs. HPS - Dividend Comparison

HPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, which matches HPS's 9.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPI
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
9.22%9.15%8.91%9.39%9.23%7.14%7.53%7.69%8.92%7.84%8.26%7.69%
HPS
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III
9.25%9.16%8.78%9.34%9.15%7.04%7.63%7.41%9.26%7.82%8.27%7.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HPI and HPS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HPI has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to HPS (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HPI dropped -67.67% vs HPS's -70.04%.

HPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HPI and HPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer