PSF vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
PSF is managed by Cohen & Steers. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
PSF vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSF vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSF Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund | -0.57% | 10.63% | 12.84% | 9.88% | -24.55% | 3.89% | -3.78% | 42.60% | -9.01% | 16.79% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 9.43% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSF achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 9.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PSF has underperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 5.66%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.93% annualized return.
PSF
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSF vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSF has a 4.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSF vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
PSF
CSUIX
PSF vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSF | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.71 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 2.27 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 2.50 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 10.88 | -8.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSF | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.71 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.65 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSF and CSUIX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PSF vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
PSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, which matches CSUIX's 7.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSF Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund | 7.64% | 7.46% | 7.65% | 8.29% | 8.65% | 9.08% | 7.02% | 6.55% | 8.68% | 7.70% | 9.35% | 8.81% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.69% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
PSF vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSF drawdown since its inception was -55.01%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSF and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSF | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.01% | -52.01% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -7.99% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.80% | -20.01% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.01% | -35.01% | -20.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.62% | -3.49% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -8.21% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.84% | +0.57% |
Volatility
PSF vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund (PSF) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.43%. This indicates that PSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSF | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 3.43% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 6.90% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 11.49% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 12.87% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 14.88% | +6.23% |