PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 12.73%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.


PSET

1D
-0.77%
1M
2.67%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
-0.66%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
12.73%

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
-0.49%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and VV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.72

The correlation between PSET and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
VV

Technology

37.9%
35.9%

Industrials

19.1%
8.0%

Financial Services

14.3%
11.8%

Healthcare

10.8%
8.6%

Communication Services

6.7%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
9.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.6%

Energy

1.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

PSET
37.9%
VV
35.9%

Industrials

PSET
19.1%
VV
8.0%

Financial Services

PSET
14.3%
VV
11.8%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
VV
8.6%

Communication Services

PSET
6.7%
VV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.4%
VV
9.8%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
VV
1.6%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
VV
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
VV
4.8%

Real Estate

PSET

-

VV
1.7%

Utilities

PSET

-

VV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSETVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

3.03

-2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

13.86

-11.87

PSET vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSETVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

2.33

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.79

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.59

+0.12

Drawdowns

PSET vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-54.81%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-9.21%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-18.97%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-25.66%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-34.28%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-0.72%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-6.84%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.01%

+1.81%

Volatility

PSET vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.84%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

8.98%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

11.99%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

17.22%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

18.19%

-0.13%

PSET vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.63%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PSET and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PSET has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 12.73% for PSET. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.63% for PSET.

PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer