PSET vs. USMC
PSET (Principal Quality ETF) and USMC (Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Principal - PSET tracks the NASDAQ US Price Setters while USMC tracks the Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSET returned 8.86%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for USMC. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSET charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for USMC.
Performance
PSET vs. USMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than USMC's 8.73% return.
PSET
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 7.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
USMC
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PSET vs. USMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | -0.49% | 7.27% | 17.65% | 24.07% | -16.52% | 29.59% | 16.20% | 34.85% | -2.29% | 6.29% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 8.73% | 14.99% | 29.82% | 31.57% | -17.17% | 26.30% | 16.05% | 27.37% | -2.30% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and USMC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PSET and USMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSET vs. USMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSET
USMC
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PSET
USMC
Industrials
PSET
USMC
Financial Services
PSET
USMC
Healthcare
PSET
USMC
Communication Services
PSET
USMC
Consumer Cyclical
PSET
USMC
Basic Materials
PSET
USMC
-
Energy
PSET
USMC
Consumer Defensive
PSET
USMC
Real Estate
PSET
-
USMC
-
Utilities
PSET
-
USMC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSET vs. USMC — Risk / Return Rank
PSET
USMC
PSET vs. USMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSET | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 2.30 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | 8.80 | -6.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSET | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 2.01 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.95 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PSET vs. USMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, which is greater than USMC's maximum drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and USMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSET | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.74% | -29.97% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -10.30% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.96% | -19.12% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -24.09% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -0.35% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -4.40% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.69% | +1.13% |
Volatility
PSET vs. USMC - Volatility Comparison
Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) at 2.52%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSET | USMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.52% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 8.68% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 11.81% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 16.36% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 18.25% | -0.19% |
PSET vs. USMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USMC's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PSET vs. USMC - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than USMC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.63% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% |
USMC Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.35% | 1.78% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.28% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSET and USMC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSET has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to USMC (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs USMC's -29.97%.
On 5-year performance, USMC leads with 15.40% vs 8.86% for PSET. On fees, USMC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, USMC has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMC has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PSET.
USMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.63% for PSET.
PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while USMC tracks Nasdaq US Mega Cap Select Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.12% for USMC.
USMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSET and USMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer