PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.


PSET

1D
0.59%
1M
2.94%
6M
1.58%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
12.63%

QARP

1D
0.71%
1M
1.10%
6M
9.34%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
25.00%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSET vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
2.37%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-1.84%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
12.78%13.99%18.94%23.03%-14.62%31.82%14.83%30.70%-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and QARP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.75

The correlation between PSET and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
QARP

Technology

38.5%
23.5%

Industrials

19.0%
8.5%

Financial Services

13.8%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.8%
13.9%

Communication Services

6.6%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
9.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.3%

Energy

1.4%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
9.6%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

PSET
38.5%
QARP
23.5%

Industrials

PSET
19.0%
QARP
8.5%

Financial Services

PSET
13.8%
QARP
12.1%

Healthcare

PSET
10.8%
QARP
13.9%

Communication Services

PSET
6.6%
QARP
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.5%
QARP
9.6%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.3%
QARP
2.3%

Energy

PSET
1.4%
QARP
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
QARP
9.6%

Real Estate

PSET

-

QARP
1.0%

Utilities

PSET

-

QARP
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSET vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSETQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.43

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

3.46

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

15.38

-13.79

PSET vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSET vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-35.44%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-7.26%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-15.65%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-22.75%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.39%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

1.63%

+2.32%

Volatility

PSET vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Principal Quality ETF (PSET) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that PSET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.76%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

8.22%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

10.58%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

15.54%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

19.55%

-1.46%

PSET vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.69%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSET and QARP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSET has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 8.47% for PSET. On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QARP.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.69% for PSET.

PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer