PSEP vs. CGUS
PSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September) and CGUS (Capital Group Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSEP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while CGUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. PSEP is passively managed, while CGUS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSEP returned 13.16%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for CGUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSEP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGUS.
Performance
PSEP vs. CGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSEP achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than CGUS's 9.93% return.
PSEP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- —
CGUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSEP vs. CGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 4.91% | 11.85% | 12.44% | 18.84% | 0.34% |
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 9.93% | 16.21% | 24.89% | 27.72% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSEP and CGUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PSEP and CGUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSEP vs. CGUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSEP
CGUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSEP
CGUS
Financial Services
PSEP
CGUS
Communication Services
PSEP
CGUS
Consumer Cyclical
PSEP
CGUS
Healthcare
PSEP
CGUS
Industrials
PSEP
CGUS
Consumer Defensive
PSEP
CGUS
Energy
PSEP
CGUS
Utilities
PSEP
CGUS
Real Estate
PSEP
CGUS
Basic Materials
PSEP
CGUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSEP vs. CGUS — Risk / Return Rank
PSEP
CGUS
PSEP vs. CGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) and Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSEP | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.38 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 2.67 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 12.44 | +6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSEP | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.08 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.97 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PSEP vs. CGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSEP drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum CGUS drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSEP and CGUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSEP | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -21.86% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -9.59% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -18.06% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.74% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -4.65% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 2.06% | -1.29% |
Volatility
PSEP vs. CGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) is 0.70%, while Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that PSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSEP | CGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 2.89% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.25% | 9.46% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.71% | 12.33% | -6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 16.38% | -7.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 16.38% | -6.26% |
PSEP vs. CGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CGUS's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSEP vs. CGUS - Dividend Comparison
PSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGUS Capital Group Core Equity ETF | 0.87% | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.10% |
PSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PSEP and CGUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CGUS has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to PSEP (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSEP dropped -17.90% vs CGUS's -21.86%.
On 3-year performance, CGUS leads with 22.34% vs 13.16% for PSEP. On fees, CGUS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, PSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGUS has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 13.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGUS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PSEP.
CGUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for PSEP.
PSEP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CGUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PSEP and 0.33% for CGUS.
PSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSEP and CGUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer