PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSEP vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSEP vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSEP vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PSEP
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September
-1.51%11.85%12.44%18.84%-3.74%8.85%8.48%4.62%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%15.95%23.16%-7.04%12.58%6.19%8.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSEP achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


PSEP

1D
1.60%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
0.26%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
11.96%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSEP vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSEP and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

PSEP vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSEP
PSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSEP vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSEPBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

1.29

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.99

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.74

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

11.59

-1.66

PSEP vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSEP and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSEPBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.29

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.75

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between PSEP and BAPR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSEP vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSEP nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PSEP vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSEP drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSEP and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSEPBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-23.91%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-9.19%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.92%

-15.58%

+5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

0.00%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-2.66%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.38%

-0.13%

Volatility

PSEP vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) is 2.93%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that PSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSEPBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.45%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

4.26%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

11.90%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.59%

11.54%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

13.25%

-3.02%