PSDM vs. DIAL
PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and DIAL (Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. PSDM is actively managed, while DIAL is passively managed. Over the past year, PSDM returned 5.16% vs 6.65% for DIAL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSDM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DIAL.
Performance
PSDM vs. DIAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSDM achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than DIAL's 0.88% return.
PSDM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIAL
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 6.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM vs. DIAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.23% | 6.16% | 5.48% | 3.96% |
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 0.88% | 9.93% | 1.69% | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSDM and DIAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PSDM and DIAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSDM vs. DIAL — Risk / Return Rank
PSDM
DIAL
PSDM vs. DIAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) and Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSDM | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.96 | 1.64 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.06 | 2.43 | +2.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.30 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 2.00 | +2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.69 | 7.79 | +11.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSDM | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 1.64 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 0.36 | +2.61 |
Drawdowns
PSDM vs. DIAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSDM drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum DIAL drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDM and DIAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSDM | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -22.19% | +21.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -3.34% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.88% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -5.54% | +5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 0.86% | -0.60% |
Volatility
PSDM vs. DIAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) is 0.53%, while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that PSDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSDM | DIAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 1.57% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 3.23% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 4.08% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 7.03% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 7.03% | -5.02% |
PSDM vs. DIAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSDM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DIAL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSDM vs. DIAL - Dividend Comparison
PSDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than DIAL's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIAL Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF | 5.05% | 4.81% | 4.67% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.46% | 2.61% | 3.27% | 3.56% | 0.65% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSDM and DIAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIAL has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDM dropped -1.19% vs DIAL's -22.19%.
On 1-year performance, DIAL leads with 6.65% vs 5.16% for PSDM. On fees, DIAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSDM has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIAL has performed better with a 6.65% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PSDM.
DIAL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 4.85% for PSDM.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PSDM and 0.29% for DIAL.
PSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSDM and DIAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer