PSCZX vs. SDMZX
PSCZX (PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z) and SDMZX (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PSCZX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM, while SDMZX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, PSCZX returned 13.71%/yr vs 3.10%/yr for SDMZX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCZX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for SDMZX.
Performance
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCZX achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly higher than SDMZX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCZX has outperformed SDMZX with an annualized return of 13.71%, while SDMZX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.10% annualized return.
PSCZX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
SDMZX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCZX PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z | 17.09% | 7.29% | 16.22% | 11.85% | -18.57% | 29.43% | 27.53% | 40.68% | -13.42% | 19.81% |
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 0.81% | 6.18% | 5.64% | 6.25% | -4.82% | -0.19% | 3.97% | 7.92% | 0.95% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCZX and SDMZX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, PSCZX and SDMZX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCZX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCZX
SDMZX
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z (PSCZX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCZX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.65 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | 9.31 | +4.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCZX drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than SDMZX's maximum drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCZX and SDMZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCZX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.47% | -9.76% | -46.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.83% | -1.77% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.25% | -1.77% | -21.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -8.51% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.40% | -9.76% | -37.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.77% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -0.99% | -9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 0.50% | +1.99% |
Volatility
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z (PSCZX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) at 2.49%. This indicates that PSCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCZX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 2.49% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 2.83% | +10.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 3.16% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 2.57% | +17.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 2.58% | +19.60% |
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCZX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCZX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison
PSCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than SDMZX's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCZX PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund Class Z | 5.87% | 6.87% | 4.72% | 0.50% | 3.67% | 31.87% | 13.30% | 16.41% | 19.48% | 7.97% | 5.32% | 14.40% |
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 4.71% | 4.62% | 4.57% | 3.36% | 4.70% | 2.76% | 3.10% | 6.18% | 3.47% | 2.64% | 2.76% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCZX and SDMZX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCZX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to SDMZX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCZX dropped -56.47% vs SDMZX's -9.76%.
PSCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCZX and SDMZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer