PSCX vs. XMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PSCX is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, PSCX returned 15.49% vs 24.62% for XMAG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.

Performance

PSCX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.

PSCX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.11%	12.08%	1.34%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	15.63%	-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and XMAG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.80

The correlation between PSCX and XMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCX vs. XMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCX	XMAG
Technology	33.2%	25.3%
Financial Services	12.5%	17.3%
Communication Services	10.3%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	6.2%
Healthcare	9.6%	13.0%
Industrials	8.4%	12.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	7.3%
Energy	4.2%	5.5%
Utilities	2.6%	3.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	2.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.5%

Return for Risk

PSCX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCX	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.23	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.22	3.21	+1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.39	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	3.39	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.94	15.15	+3.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCX vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCX	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.23	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	1.11	+0.16

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum XMAG drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and XMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCX	XMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-16.17%	+5.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-7.29%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	0.00%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-2.13%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	1.63%	-0.81%

Volatility

PSCX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 0.89%, while Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCX	XMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	2.87%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.21%	8.65%	-4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.53%	11.10%	-5.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.07%	15.12%	-8.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.96%	15.12%	-8.16%

PSCX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCX and XMAG in my portfolio?

PSCX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCX or XMAG?

XMAG has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

Which ETF is better, PSCX or XMAG?

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs 15.49% for PSCX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCX or XMAG?

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCX or XMAG?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCX or XMAG?

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between PSCX and XMAG?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.35% for XMAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.