PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCX vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCX vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


PSCX

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.98%
1Y
15.49%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCX vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
5.11%12.08%13.27%16.57%-7.35%9.03%0.81%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and SRVR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.56

The correlation between PSCX and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCX vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCX
SRVR

Technology

33.2%
6.8%

Financial Services

12.5%
0.9%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Industrials

8.4%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Energy

4.2%
3.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
66.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.8%

Technology

PSCX
33.2%
SRVR
6.8%

Financial Services

PSCX
12.5%
SRVR
0.9%

Communication Services

PSCX
10.3%
SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCX
10.0%
SRVR

-

Healthcare

PSCX
9.6%
SRVR

-

Industrials

PSCX
8.4%
SRVR
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSCX
5.4%
SRVR

-

Energy

PSCX
4.2%
SRVR
3.8%

Utilities

PSCX
2.6%
SRVR
2.2%

Real Estate

PSCX
2.0%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

PSCX
1.9%
SRVR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCX vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCX vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCXSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.13

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.76

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.94

1.64

+17.30

PSCX vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCXSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

0.67

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

-0.04

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.30

+0.97

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCXSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-40.99%

+30.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

-14.78%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

-18.34%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

-40.99%

+30.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-12.28%

+12.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-15.27%

+13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

6.83%

-6.01%

Volatility

PSCX vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 0.89%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCXSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

5.47%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

13.12%

-8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.53%

16.72%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

19.71%

-12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

21.44%

-14.48%

PSCX vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCX vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSCX
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCX and SRVR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, PSCX leads with 8.46% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSCX has performed better with a 8.46% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

PSCX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.60% for SRVR.

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCX and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer