PSCX vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PSCX is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, PSCX returned 14.18% vs 53.10% for NRSH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PSCX vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 43.75% return.

PSCX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.46%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: 12.23%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 43.75%
• 6M: 40.21%
• 1Y: 53.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCX vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	4.46%	12.08%	13.27%	1.26%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	43.75%	12.95%	-6.17%	9.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCX and NRSH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023	0.61

The correlation between PSCX and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCX vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCX	NRSH
Technology	33.2%	36.7%
Financial Services	12.5%	-
Communication Services	10.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Healthcare	9.6%	-
Industrials	8.4%	57.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Energy	4.2%	2.5%
Utilities	2.6%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	5.4%
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

PSCX vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 84
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 72
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCX vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCX	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.05	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	2.68	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.34	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	4.88	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.03	14.81	+2.21

PSCX vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCX and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCX vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCX	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-24.01%	+13.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-10.94%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-3.08%	+2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.56%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	3.59%	-2.76%

Volatility

PSCX vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 1.79%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCX	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	10.49%	-8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	21.77%	-17.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.65%	26.00%	-20.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.11%	22.07%	-14.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	22.07%	-15.10%

PSCX vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSCX and NRSH have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PSCX vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.29%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCX and NRSH in my portfolio?

PSCX and NRSH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCX or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to PSCX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, PSCX or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 53.10% vs 14.18% for PSCX. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCX or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 53.10% return vs 14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCX or NRSH?

PSCX and NRSH have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCX or NRSH?

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between PSCX and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Aztlan.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.