PSCX vs. DBO
PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Pacer, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PSCX is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCX returned 8.46%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
PSCX vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
PSCX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PSCX vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.11% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCX and DBO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.04 |
The correlation between PSCX and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCX vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCX
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PSCX
DBO
-
Financial Services
PSCX
DBO
Communication Services
PSCX
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCX
DBO
-
Healthcare
PSCX
DBO
-
Industrials
PSCX
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCX
DBO
-
Energy
PSCX
DBO
-
Utilities
PSCX
DBO
-
Real Estate
PSCX
DBO
-
Basic Materials
PSCX
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCX vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
PSCX
DBO
PSCX vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.38 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.44 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.94 | 9.02 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.34 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.50 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.02 | +1.25 |
Drawdowns
PSCX vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCX drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCX and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -90.18% | +79.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -18.19% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | -28.20% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.20% | -37.68% | +27.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -51.38% | +51.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -62.25% | +60.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 8.92% | -8.10% |
Volatility
PSCX vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) is 0.89%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCX | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 12.61% | -11.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 28.20% | -23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.53% | 34.46% | -28.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 32.29% | -25.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 31.78% | -24.82% |
PSCX vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCX vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCX and DBO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCX dropped -10.20% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.98% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, PSCX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
PSCX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSCX and 0.78% for DBO.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCX and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer