PSCU vs. COMB
PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. PSCU is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCU returned 1.21%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for COMB. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCU charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
PSCU vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCU achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 19.38% return.
PSCU
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
COMB
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 27.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 12.30% | -1.93% | 10.68% | 2.12% | -19.73% | 30.12% | 3.80% | 9.67% | -4.80% | 6.96% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 19.38% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCU and COMB is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PSCU and COMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCU vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
PSCU
COMB
PSCU vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCU | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.89 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 6.30 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCU vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCU drawdown since its inception was -29.97%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCU and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCU | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.97% | -33.50% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -14.84% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.55% | -14.84% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -26.63% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -9.96% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -12.05% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 4.44% | -1.05% |
Volatility
PSCU vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCU | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.57% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 15.16% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 17.46% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 16.71% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 15.15% | +4.35% |
PSCU vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCU has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCU vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
PSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than COMB's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.58% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCU and COMB have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to PSCU (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCU dropped -29.97% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 9.97% vs 1.21% for PSCU. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCU.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 0.99% for PSCU.
PSCU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCU and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCU and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer