PSCQ vs. CTIF

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PSCQ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF) and CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while CTIF is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Castellan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSCQ returned 12.75% vs 13.36% for CTIF. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSCQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTIF.

Performance

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCQ achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than CTIF's 9.32% return.

PSCQ

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.78%
• 6M: 5.76%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 12.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.18%

CTIF

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 4.08%
• 6M: 7.06%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 1Y: 13.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	$185.99K	$160.92K	$255.19K
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF	$18.42K	$11.33K	$24.43K

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF	6.57%	7.74%
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	9.32%	3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCQ and CTIF is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.70

The correlation between PSCQ and CTIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSCQ vs. CTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCQ

PSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 83
PSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CTIF

CTIF Risk / Return Rank: 35
CTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCQ	CTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	0.86	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.29	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.15	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.17	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.68	4.27	+8.41

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the CTIF Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCQ and CTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, which is greater than CTIF's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and CTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCQ	CTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	-9.43%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.58%	-9.43%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-1.76%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	2.59%	-1.66%

Volatility

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) is 1.58%, while Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that PSCQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCQ	CTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	3.85%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.76%	9.76%	-5.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.04%	12.83%	-6.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.52%	12.61%	-5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.52%	12.61%	-5.09%

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCQ vs. CTIF - Dividend Comparison

PSCQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%.

Position	TTM	2025
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	4.75%	2.55%
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCQ and CTIF in my portfolio?

PSCQ and CTIF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCQ or CTIF?

CTIF has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to PSCQ (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCQ dropped -9.92% vs CTIF's -9.43%.

Which ETF is better, PSCQ or CTIF?

On 1-year performance, CTIF leads with 13.36% vs 12.75% for PSCQ. On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCQ or CTIF?

Over the 1-year period, CTIF has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCQ or CTIF?

CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSCQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCQ or CTIF?

CTIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 0.00% for PSCQ.

What is the main difference between PSCQ and CTIF?

PSCQ is categorized as Options Trading, while CTIF is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSCQ and 0.45% for CTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.