PSCM vs. SETM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSCM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF) and SETM (Sprott Critical Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - PSCM tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC while SETM tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCM returned 18.03%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for SETM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SETM.

Performance

PSCM vs. SETM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCM achieves a 23.80% return, which is significantly higher than SETM's 11.16% return.

PSCM

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 23.80%
• 6M: 22.73%
• 1Y: 53.82%
• 3Y*: 18.03%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

SETM

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -8.14%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 95.17%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCM vs. SETM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	23.80%	15.59%	0.67%	3.88%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	11.16%	95.27%	-13.24%	-13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCM and SETM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.56

The correlation between PSCM and SETM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCM vs. SETM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCM	SETM
Basic Materials	90.9%	76.0%
Energy	7.1%	22.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PSCM vs. SETM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCM

PSCM Risk / Return Rank: 74
PSCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PSCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
PSCM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PSCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PSCM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 61
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCM vs. SETM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSCM	SETM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.05	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.41	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	3.70	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.00	10.56	+3.44

PSCM vs. SETM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the SETM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCM and SETM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSCM vs. SETM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCM drawdown since its inception was -51.34%, which is greater than SETM's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCM and SETM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCM	SETM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.34%	-42.81%	-8.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-25.85%	+11.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.36%	-42.81%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-19.00%	+14.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.88%	-15.03%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	9.04%	-5.18%

Volatility

PSCM vs. SETM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF (PSCM) is 8.22%, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that PSCM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SETM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCM	SETM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	17.16%	-8.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.32%	37.55%	-20.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.46%	46.69%	-22.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.83%	37.23%	-11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.89%	37.23%	-10.34%

PSCM vs. SETM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SETM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCM vs. SETM - Dividend Comparison

PSCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SETM's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCM Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF	0.97%	1.17%	0.80%	0.81%	0.93%	0.67%	1.56%	1.14%	1.25%	0.61%	0.76%	1.33%
SETM Sprott Critical Materials ETF	1.41%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCM and SETM in my portfolio?

PSCM and SETM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCM or SETM?

SETM has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to PSCM (8.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCM dropped -51.34% vs SETM's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, PSCM or SETM?

On 3-year performance, SETM leads with 25.14% vs 18.03% for PSCM. On fees, PSCM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCM has been the lower-risk option at 8.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCM or SETM?

Over the 3-year period, SETM has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCM or SETM?

PSCM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCM or SETM?

SETM has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.97% for PSCM.

What is the main difference between PSCM and SETM?

PSCM tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Materials -SEC, while SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCM and 0.65% for SETM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.