PSCI vs. XMMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCI returned 14.92%/yr vs 19.73%/yr for XMMO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.

Performance

PSCI vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCI achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCI has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 14.92%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.

PSCI

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 13.66%
• 1Y: 35.33%
• 3Y*: 21.37%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: 14.92%

XMMO

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: 23.73%
• 6M: 25.73%
• 1Y: 36.97%
• 3Y*: 32.10%
• 5Y*: 16.69%
• 10Y*: 19.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCI vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF	13.72%	13.50%	16.68%	31.64%	-9.02%	24.44%	12.02%	29.80%	-13.20%	17.52%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	23.73%	13.04%	38.03%	20.39%	-16.02%	16.69%	29.17%	36.78%	6.12%	37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCI and XMMO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010	0.77

The correlation between PSCI and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCI vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCI	XMMO
Industrials	82.9%	41.1%
Technology	7.1%	16.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	4.6%
Energy	2.1%	7.7%
Basic Materials	0.9%	7.2%
Real Estate	0.7%	6.1%
Healthcare	0.5%	6.3%
Communication Services	0.4%	1.6%
Financial Services	0.0%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	5.8%

Return for Risk

PSCI vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCI

PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 48
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 49

XMMO

XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCI vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCI	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.99	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.77	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	4.45	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.11	18.21	-10.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCI vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCI Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCI and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCI	XMMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.99	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.78	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.89	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.58	-0.01

Drawdowns

PSCI vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCI drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCI and XMMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCI	XMMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.55%	-55.37%	+9.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-8.34%	-6.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.36%	-24.93%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.36%	-27.91%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.55%	-36.74%	-8.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	0.00%	-2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-9.45%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.37%	2.04%	+2.33%

Volatility

PSCI vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) is 6.10%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that PSCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCI	XMMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	7.82%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.45%	15.54%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.05%	18.71%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.02%	21.45%	+1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.25%	22.27%	+2.98%

PSCI vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCI vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF	1.40%	1.56%	0.65%	0.72%	0.87%	0.69%	0.59%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.74%	1.02%
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF	0.60%	0.78%	0.34%	0.80%	1.43%	0.41%	0.61%	0.60%	0.19%	0.21%	0.22%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCI and XMMO in my portfolio?

PSCI and XMMO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCI or XMMO?

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to PSCI (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCI dropped -45.55% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

Which ETF is better, PSCI or XMMO?

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.73% vs 14.92% for PSCI. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCI has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCI or XMMO?

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCI or XMMO?

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCI or XMMO?

PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

What is the main difference between PSCI and XMMO?

PSCI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCI and 0.35% for XMMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.