PSCI vs. QQQM
PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCI returned 13.36%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PSCI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCI achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PSCI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 35.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 13.72% | 13.50% | 16.68% | 31.64% | -9.02% | 24.44% | 18.62% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCI and QQQM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PSCI and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCI vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCI
QQQM
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
PSCI
QQQM
Technology
PSCI
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PSCI
QQQM
Energy
PSCI
QQQM
Basic Materials
PSCI
QQQM
Real Estate
PSCI
QQQM
Healthcare
PSCI
QQQM
Communication Services
PSCI
QQQM
Financial Services
PSCI
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PSCI
-
QQQM
Utilities
PSCI
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PSCI
QQQM
PSCI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCI | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.53 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 13.52 | -5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCI | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.65 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
PSCI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCI drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCI and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCI | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.55% | -35.04% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -11.96% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -22.70% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | -35.04% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -0.20% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -8.25% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 3.11% | +1.26% |
Volatility
PSCI vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that PSCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCI | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.48% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 12.05% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.05% | 15.91% | +5.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 22.24% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.25% | 22.12% | +3.13% |
PSCI vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCI vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 1.40% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.02% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCI and QQQM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCI dropped -45.55% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 13.36% for PSCI. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 13.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCI.
PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PSCI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCI and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCI and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer