PSCI vs. FOWF
PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - PSCI tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index while FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSCI returned 35.33% vs 22.10% for FOWF. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.
Performance
PSCI vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCI achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than FOWF's 9.44% return.
PSCI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 35.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
FOWF
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 12.30%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCI vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 13.72% | 13.50% | -0.72% |
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 9.44% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCI and FOWF is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PSCI and FOWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCI vs. FOWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCI
FOWF
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PSCI
FOWF
Technology
PSCI
FOWF
Consumer Cyclical
PSCI
FOWF
Energy
PSCI
FOWF
-
Basic Materials
PSCI
FOWF
Real Estate
PSCI
FOWF
-
Healthcare
PSCI
FOWF
-
Communication Services
PSCI
FOWF
Financial Services
PSCI
FOWF
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCI
-
FOWF
-
Utilities
PSCI
-
FOWF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCI vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank
PSCI
FOWF
PSCI vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCI | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.20 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 7.02 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCI | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.59 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.63 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
PSCI vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCI drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, which is greater than FOWF's maximum drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCI and FOWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCI | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.55% | -12.29% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -10.08% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -2.81% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -2.05% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 3.16% | +1.21% |
Volatility
PSCI vs. FOWF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) at 4.80%. This indicates that PSCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCI | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.80% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 11.62% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.05% | 13.94% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 16.89% | +6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.25% | 16.89% | +8.36% |
PSCI vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCI vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison
PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than FOWF's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 1.40% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCI and FOWF have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to FOWF (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCI dropped -45.55% vs FOWF's -12.29%.
On 1-year performance, PSCI leads with 35.33% vs 22.10% for FOWF. On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FOWF has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSCI has performed better with a 35.33% return vs 22.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FOWF.
PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.73% for FOWF.
PSCI tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCI and 0.49% for FOWF.
PSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCI and FOWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer