PSCH vs. GDOC
PSCH (Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF) and GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. PSCH is passively managed, while GDOC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCH returned 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for GDOC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCH charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GDOC.
Performance
PSCH vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCH achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than GDOC's -7.76% return.
PSCH
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
GDOC
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -9.87%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCH vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 1.80% | -0.49% | 3.77% | -2.71% | -25.15% | -5.53% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -7.76% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCH and GDOC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PSCH and GDOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCH vs. GDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCH
GDOC
Healthcare
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PSCH
GDOC
Technology
PSCH
GDOC
-
Financial Services
PSCH
GDOC
-
Industrials
PSCH
GDOC
-
Basic Materials
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Communication Services
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCH
-
GDOC
Energy
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Real Estate
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Utilities
PSCH
-
GDOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCH vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank
PSCH
GDOC
PSCH vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCH | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 0.33 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 0.76 | +1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCH | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.33 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | -0.19 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
PSCH vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than GDOC's maximum drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and GDOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCH | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -31.01% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -15.67% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.98% | -22.51% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.59% | -15.53% | -15.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -15.90% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 6.83% | -1.29% |
Volatility
PSCH vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) is 4.19%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that PSCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCH | GDOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.90% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.06% | 11.61% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 15.64% | +4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 18.79% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 18.79% | +4.84% |
PSCH vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCH vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison
PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GDOC's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.27% | 0.01% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCH and GDOC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDOC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PSCH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCH dropped -46.32% vs GDOC's -31.01%.
On 3-year performance, PSCH leads with 0.45% vs 0.05% for GDOC. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSCH has performed better with a 0.45% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
GDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCH and 0.75% for GDOC.
PSCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCH and GDOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer