PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCH vs. GDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCH vs. GDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCH achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than GDOC's -7.76% return.


PSCH

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
1.80%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-5.72%
10Y*
6.81%

GDOC

1D
0.41%
1M
1.93%
YTD
-7.76%
6M
-9.87%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
0.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCH vs. GDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
1.80%-0.49%3.77%-2.71%-25.15%-5.53%
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
-7.76%10.74%-1.66%4.60%-17.12%-2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCH and GDOC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021

0.78

The correlation between PSCH and GDOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCH vs. GDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCH
GDOC

Healthcare

97.3%
97.3%

Technology

1.7%

-

Financial Services

1.1%

-

Industrials

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PSCH
97.3%
GDOC
97.3%

Technology

PSCH
1.7%
GDOC

-

Financial Services

PSCH
1.1%
GDOC

-

Industrials

PSCH
0.7%
GDOC

-

Basic Materials

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Communication Services

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCH

-

GDOC
1.0%

Energy

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Real Estate

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Utilities

PSCH

-

GDOC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCH vs. GDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GDOC
GDOC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCH vs. GDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCHGDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.33

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

0.76

+1.08

PSCH vs. GDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the GDOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCH and GDOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCHGDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.33

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

-0.19

+0.70

Drawdowns

PSCH vs. GDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than GDOC's maximum drawdown of -31.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and GDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCHGDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

-31.01%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

-15.67%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

-22.51%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.59%

-15.53%

-15.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.46%

-15.90%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

6.83%

-1.29%

Volatility

PSCH vs. GDOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) is 4.19%, while Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that PSCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCHGDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.90%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

11.61%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

15.64%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

18.79%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

18.79%

+4.84%

PSCH vs. GDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GDOC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCH vs. GDOC - Dividend Comparison

PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than GDOC's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
0.35%0.32%0.02%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCH and GDOC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDOC has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to PSCH (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCH dropped -46.32% vs GDOC's -31.01%.

On 3-year performance, PSCH leads with 0.45% vs 0.05% for GDOC. On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCH has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSCH has performed better with a 0.45% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.

GDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCH and 0.75% for GDOC.

PSCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCH and GDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer