PSCH vs. CNCR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR).

PSCH and CNCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCH is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. CNCR is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2015. Both PSCH and CNCR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PSCH vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PSCH vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF	-5.46%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

PSCH

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -6.37%
• 6M: -1.85%
• 1Y: -2.33%
• 3Y*: -1.76%
• 5Y*: -7.33%
• 10Y*: 6.54%

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCH vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

CNCR

Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF

PSCH

Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF

Return for Risk

PSCH vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCH

PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 8
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCH vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCH	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCH	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	—	—

Dividends

PSCH vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF	0.01%	0.04%	0.27%	0.01%	2.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PSCH vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCH	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.32%	0.00%	-46.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.16%	0.00%	-36.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	0.00%	-13.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSCH	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.32%	0.00%	+23.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.91%	0.00%	+22.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	0.00%	+23.64%