PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCH vs. CNCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCH vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSCH

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
1.80%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
0.45%
5Y*
-5.72%
10Y*
6.81%

CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCH vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


PSCH vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCH
CNCR

Healthcare

97.3%
96.6%

Technology

1.7%

-

Financial Services

1.1%
3.3%

Industrials

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PSCH
97.3%
CNCR
96.6%

Technology

PSCH
1.7%
CNCR

-

Financial Services

PSCH
1.1%
CNCR
3.3%

Industrials

PSCH
0.7%
CNCR

-

Basic Materials

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Communication Services

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Energy

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Real Estate

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Utilities

PSCH

-

CNCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCH vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCH
PSCH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PSCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CNCR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCH vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCHCNCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

PSCH vs. CNCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCHCNCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

Drawdowns

PSCH vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCH drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCH and CNCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCHCNCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.32%

0.00%

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.59%

0.00%

-30.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.46%

0.00%

-13.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

Volatility

PSCH vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCHCNCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

0.00%

+20.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

0.00%

+22.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

0.00%

+23.63%

PSCH vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCH has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCH vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

PSCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCH
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
0.01%0.04%0.27%0.01%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PSCH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

PSCH has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCH and 0.79% for CNCR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCH and CNCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer