PSCF vs. QQQM
PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCF returned 2.81%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
PSCF vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
PSCF
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCF vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 4.89% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | 21.30% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCF and QQQM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.47 |
The correlation between PSCF and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCF vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCF
QQQM
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSCF
QQQM
Real Estate
PSCF
QQQM
Technology
PSCF
QQQM
Industrials
PSCF
QQQM
Basic Materials
PSCF
-
QQQM
Communication Services
PSCF
-
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
PSCF
-
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
PSCF
-
QQQM
Energy
PSCF
-
QQQM
Healthcare
PSCF
-
QQQM
Utilities
PSCF
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCF vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
PSCF
QQQM
PSCF vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 2.65 | -1.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 3.46 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.53 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 13.52 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.65 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.82 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.85 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
PSCF vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -35.04% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -11.96% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -22.70% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | -35.04% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -0.20% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -8.25% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.11% | +0.61% |
Volatility
PSCF vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCF | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.48% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 12.05% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 15.91% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 22.24% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 22.12% | +2.67% |
PSCF vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCF vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.42% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCF and QQQM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCF has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 2.81% for PSCF. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCF.
PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
PSCF is categorized as Financials Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCF and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer