PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCF vs. IYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCF vs. IYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's -6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCF has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 6.80%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.


PSCF

1D
-1.78%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.56%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
6.80%

IYG

1D
-1.15%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
20.32%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCF vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
4.89%6.19%15.50%6.02%-19.34%27.82%-9.07%23.13%-8.43%6.71%
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
-6.51%19.85%31.94%16.07%-16.76%30.36%0.99%37.62%-12.56%24.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCF and IYG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.79

The correlation between PSCF and IYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCF vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCF
IYG

Financial Services

66.9%
100.0%

Real Estate

30.8%

-

Technology

1.9%

-

Industrials

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

PSCF
66.9%
IYG
100.0%

Real Estate

PSCF
30.8%
IYG

-

Technology

PSCF
1.9%
IYG

-

Industrials

PSCF
0.3%
IYG

-

Basic Materials

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Communication Services

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Consumer Defensive

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Energy

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Healthcare

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Utilities

PSCF

-

IYG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCF vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCF
PSCF Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IYG
IYG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCF vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCFIYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.36

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

0.93

+3.57

PSCF vs. IYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the IYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCF and IYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCFIYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.37

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.39

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.57

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.22

+0.15

Drawdowns

PSCF vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and IYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCFIYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.46%

-81.84%

+36.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-15.90%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.34%

-18.54%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.77%

-29.62%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-44.32%

-1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-9.77%

+5.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-20.75%

+12.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

6.09%

-2.37%

Volatility

PSCF vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) at 3.38%. This indicates that PSCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCFIYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.38%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

11.78%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

15.40%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.47%

20.43%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.79%

23.53%

+1.26%

PSCF vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCF vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison

PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than IYG's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYG
iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
1.14%1.00%1.16%1.77%2.07%1.25%1.71%1.59%1.81%1.24%1.28%1.33%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
2.42%2.09%2.48%3.32%2.93%1.83%3.57%4.27%4.21%2.26%3.01%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCF and IYG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCF has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to IYG (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs IYG's -81.84%.

On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.37% vs 6.80% for PSCF. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.

PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.14% for IYG.

PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 0.42% for IYG.

PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCF and IYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer