PSCF vs. IYG
PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) and IYG (iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PSCF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index while IYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCF returned 6.80%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for IYG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYG.
Performance
PSCF vs. IYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than IYG's -6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCF has underperformed IYG with an annualized return of 6.80%, while IYG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.
PSCF
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
IYG
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 20.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
PSCF vs. IYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 4.89% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | -9.07% | 23.13% | -8.43% | 6.71% |
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | -6.51% | 19.85% | 31.94% | 16.07% | -16.76% | 30.36% | 0.99% | 37.62% | -12.56% | 24.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCF and IYG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PSCF and IYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCF vs. IYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCF
IYG
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSCF
IYG
Real Estate
PSCF
IYG
-
Technology
PSCF
IYG
-
Industrials
PSCF
IYG
-
Basic Materials
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Communication Services
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Energy
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Healthcare
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Utilities
PSCF
-
IYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCF vs. IYG — Risk / Return Rank
PSCF
IYG
PSCF vs. IYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCF | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.36 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 0.93 | +3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCF | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.37 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.39 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.57 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.22 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PSCF vs. IYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum IYG drawdown of -81.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and IYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCF | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -81.84% | +36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -15.90% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -18.54% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | -29.62% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -44.32% | -1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -9.77% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -20.75% | +12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 6.09% | -2.37% |
Volatility
PSCF vs. IYG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) at 3.38%. This indicates that PSCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCF | IYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 3.38% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 11.78% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 15.40% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 20.43% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 23.53% | +1.26% |
PSCF vs. IYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IYG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCF vs. IYG - Dividend Comparison
PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than IYG's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYG iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 1.25% | 1.71% | 1.59% | 1.81% | 1.24% | 1.28% | 1.33% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.42% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCF and IYG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCF has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to IYG (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs IYG's -81.84%.
On 10-year performance, IYG leads with 13.37% vs 6.80% for PSCF. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IYG has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYG has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 6.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYG.
PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.14% for IYG.
PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while IYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services TR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 0.42% for IYG.
PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCF and IYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer