PSCF vs. BIZD
PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PSCF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index while BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCF returned 7.98%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for BIZD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCF charges 0.29%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
PSCF vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCF achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCF has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 7.98%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.
PSCF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 22.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -12.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
PSCF vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 12.95% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -19.34% | 27.82% | -9.07% | 23.13% | -8.43% | 6.71% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -9.87% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCF and BIZD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PSCF and BIZD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCF vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCF
BIZD
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSCF
BIZD
Real Estate
PSCF
BIZD
-
Technology
PSCF
BIZD
-
Industrials
PSCF
BIZD
-
Basic Materials
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Communication Services
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Energy
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Healthcare
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Utilities
PSCF
-
BIZD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCF vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
PSCF
BIZD
PSCF vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCF | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.90 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | -0.58 | +2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | -0.96 | +7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCF vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCF drawdown since its inception was -45.46%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCF and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCF | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.46% | -55.44% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | -22.22% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.34% | -22.56% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | -22.91% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.46% | -55.44% | +9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -20.05% | +20.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -6.76% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 13.30% | -9.59% |
Volatility
PSCF vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) is 4.70%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that PSCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCF | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 5.60% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 15.19% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 18.50% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 17.44% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 21.78% | +2.99% |
PSCF vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCF vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
PSCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than BIZD's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.01% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.22% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCF and BIZD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to PSCF (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCF dropped -45.46% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, PSCF leads with 7.98% vs 7.56% for BIZD. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCF has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 2.22% for PSCF.
PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCF and 12.86% for BIZD.
PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCF and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer