PSCE vs. TPYP
PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCE returned -2.40%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
PSCE vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCE has underperformed TPYP with an annualized return of -2.40%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
PSCE
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- 44.49%
- 3Y*
- 2.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- -2.40%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.10%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $960.74K | $1.29M | $1.55M | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
PSCE vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 31.68% | -9.00% | -5.47% | 5.07% | 48.45% | 59.85% | -40.31% | -14.93% | -42.98% | -26.70% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCE and TPYP is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PSCE and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSCE vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCE
TPYP
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PSCE
TPYP
Industrials
PSCE
TPYP
Basic Materials
PSCE
TPYP
Financial Services
PSCE
TPYP
Communication Services
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Healthcare
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Technology
PSCE
-
TPYP
-
Utilities
PSCE
-
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCE vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
PSCE
TPYP
PSCE vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCE | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.25 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 7.64 | +0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCE vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCE | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -51.91% | -44.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -6.84% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.57% | -13.17% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.42% | -17.96% | -27.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.70% | -51.91% | -38.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.60% | -5.54% | -71.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.00% | -7.82% | -51.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 2.91% | +2.59% |
Volatility
PSCE vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that PSCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCE | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 4.74% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 11.18% | +9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.18% | 13.98% | +13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 17.41% | +19.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.02% | 21.90% | +21.12% |
PSCE vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCE vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.29% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCE and TPYP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCE has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCE dropped -96.21% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.32% vs -2.40% for PSCE. On fees, PSCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.32% return vs -2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.29% for PSCE.
PSCE is categorized as Energy Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.40% for TPYP.
PSCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCE and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer