PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCE vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 35.93% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 13.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCE has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of -1.41%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.


PSCE

1D
1.76%
1M
7.67%
6M
15.91%
YTD
35.93%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
-1.41%
ALL TIME*
-3.92%

SPHQ

1D
-0.47%
1M
-3.64%
6M
10.07%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
14.60%
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.38M$1.78M
$119.48M$136.23M$143.26M

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
35.93%-9.00%-5.47%5.07%48.45%59.85%-40.31%-14.93%-42.98%-26.70%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
13.51%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCE and SPHQ is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between PSCE and SPHQ has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCE
SPHQ

Energy

90.0%
1.0%

Industrials

3.6%
17.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.2%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.5%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

41.2%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Energy

PSCE
90.0%
SPHQ
1.0%

Industrials

PSCE
3.6%
SPHQ
17.7%

Basic Materials

PSCE
1.2%
SPHQ
2.5%

Financial Services

PSCE
0.2%
SPHQ
15.2%

Communication Services

PSCE

-

SPHQ
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCE

-

SPHQ
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSCE

-

SPHQ
7.5%

Healthcare

PSCE

-

SPHQ
3.2%

Real Estate

PSCE

-

SPHQ

-

Technology

PSCE

-

SPHQ
41.2%

Utilities

PSCE

-

SPHQ
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCE vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSCE
PSCE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PSCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSCESPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.26

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

8.07

+1.06

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCE and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCESPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-57.83%

-38.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-8.90%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.57%

-16.57%

-28.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.42%

-25.04%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.70%

-31.60%

-59.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.85%

-6.03%

-69.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.99%

-10.64%

-48.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

2.49%

+2.90%

Volatility

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) has a higher volatility of 8.68% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.84%. This indicates that PSCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCESPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

4.84%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

12.44%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.41%

14.53%

+12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.95%

16.74%

+20.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.02%

17.97%

+25.05%

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCE vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCE
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF
2.22%2.39%1.70%2.57%1.70%0.46%0.87%0.14%0.22%0.04%0.22%0.82%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.10%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCE and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCE has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to SPHQ (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCE dropped -96.21% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.60% vs -1.41% for PSCE. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.60% return vs -1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCE.

PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.

PSCE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPHQ is Quality Factor. PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.15% for SPHQ.

PSCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCE and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer