PSCE vs. SPHQ
PSCE (Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCE returned -2.41%/yr vs 15.81%/yr for SPHQ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 32.45% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 20.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCE has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of -2.41%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.
PSCE
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- 32.45%
- 6M
- 32.62%
- 1Y
- 40.46%
- 3Y*
- 10.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.41%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 15.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.81%
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 32.45% | -9.00% | -5.47% | 5.07% | 48.45% | 59.85% | -40.31% | -14.93% | -42.98% | -26.70% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 20.05% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCE and SPHQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSCE and SPHQ has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCE
SPHQ
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
PSCE
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PSCE
SPHQ
Financial Services
PSCE
SPHQ
Communication Services
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Industrials
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PSCE
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Utilities
PSCE
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCE vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCE
SPHQ
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.53 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 15.17 | -5.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -57.83% | -38.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -8.90% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.57% | -16.57% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.42% | -25.04% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.70% | -31.60% | -59.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.47% | 0.00% | -76.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -10.68% | -48.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.07% | +2.08% |
Volatility
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 4.85%. This indicates that PSCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 4.85% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.98% | 10.87% | +8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.56% | 13.13% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.40% | 16.54% | +20.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 17.92% | +25.30% |
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCE vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SPHQ's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 2.72% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.23% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCE and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCE has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to SPHQ (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCE dropped -96.21% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.81% vs -2.41% for PSCE. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.81% return vs -2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCE.
PSCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.23% for SPHQ.
PSCE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PSCE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCE and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCE and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer