PSCE vs. NUKZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ).
PSCE and NUKZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Energy Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both PSCE and NUKZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 42.67% | -9.00% | -1.19% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 3.57% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCE achieves a 42.67% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 3.57% return.
PSCE
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 42.67%
- 6M
- 44.85%
- 1Y
- 49.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.66%
NUKZ
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.35%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 74.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCE vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCE
NUKZ
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCE | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.35 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 3.02 | -1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 4.34 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 11.46 | -4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCE | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.35 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 1.73 | -1.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCE and NUKZ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
PSCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than NUKZ's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCE Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF | 1.83% | 2.39% | 1.70% | 2.57% | 1.70% | 0.46% | 0.87% | 0.14% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.22% | 0.82% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.88% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCE drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCE and NUKZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCE | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -33.03% | -63.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.44% | -16.51% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.65% | -11.55% | -63.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.66% | -6.09% | -52.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 6.25% | +1.34% |
Volatility
PSCE vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF (PSCE) is 5.33%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that PSCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCE | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 10.20% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.54% | 21.54% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.47% | 31.75% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.21% | 32.60% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.44% | 32.60% | +10.84% |