PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCD vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCD vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCD has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 9.80%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.95% annualized return.


PSCD

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.79%
YTD
4.11%
6M
2.55%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
9.80%

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCD vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
4.11%-2.87%6.46%33.23%-28.06%37.34%29.07%17.49%-9.28%18.16%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCD and SPMO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.45

The correlation between PSCD and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSCD vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCD
SPMO

Consumer Cyclical

87.7%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.3%

Industrials

2.1%
11.3%

Technology

1.6%
52.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.0%

Communication Services

0.2%
9.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCD
87.7%
SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSCD
7.9%
SPMO
4.3%

Industrials

PSCD
2.1%
SPMO
11.3%

Technology

PSCD
1.6%
SPMO
52.6%

Real Estate

PSCD
0.6%
SPMO
1.0%

Communication Services

PSCD
0.2%
SPMO
9.2%

Basic Materials

PSCD

-

SPMO
1.6%

Energy

PSCD

-

SPMO
3.4%

Financial Services

PSCD

-

SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

PSCD

-

SPMO
6.7%

Utilities

PSCD

-

SPMO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCD vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCD
PSCD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PSCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCD vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCDSPMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

2.62

-2.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.82

3.54

-2.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.47

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

3.64

-3.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.54

14.17

-12.62

PSCD vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCD Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCD and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCDSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.62

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

1.27

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.03

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.01

-0.62

Drawdowns

PSCD vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCDSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-30.95%

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.14%

-12.70%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.93%

-20.13%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-22.74%

-19.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.57%

-30.95%

-25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

0.00%

-7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-4.60%

-6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

3.26%

+3.64%

Volatility

PSCD vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 7.62% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCDSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

7.35%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

14.39%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.18%

17.64%

+6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

19.30%

+8.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

20.31%

+8.75%

PSCD vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCD vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSCD
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.91%0.94%1.28%1.09%1.60%0.57%0.56%0.91%1.39%0.97%1.07%1.10%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSCD and SPMO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSCD has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCD dropped -56.57% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.95% vs 9.80% for PSCD. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCD.

PSCD has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.

PSCD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCD and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCD and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer