PSCC vs. XSHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ).
PSCC and XSHQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. XSHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index. It was launched on Apr 6, 2017. Both PSCC and XSHQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.80% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 12.07% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 0.55% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 11.81% | 17.37% | -6.11% | 7.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than XSHQ's 0.55% return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- -3.60%
- 1Y
- -8.21%
- 3Y*
- -3.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
XSHQ
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 8.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSCC and XSHQ have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. XSHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
XSHQ
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCC | XSHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | 0.39 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 0.73 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.81 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 2.53 | -3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCC | XSHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 0.39 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.19 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.33 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and XSHQ is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than XSHQ's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 2.19% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum XSHQ drawdown of -38.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and XSHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | XSHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -38.33% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -13.48% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -27.34% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.52% | -9.45% | -11.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -9.47% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 4.32% | +3.75% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. XSHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.93%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | XSHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.87% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 12.68% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 21.69% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 21.34% | -3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 23.26% | -3.97% |