PSCC vs. SOXQ
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSCC returned 1.40%/yr vs 34.04%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 90.62% return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
SOXQ
- 1D
- -7.82%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- 90.62%
- 6M
- 87.99%
- 1Y
- 158.27%
- 3Y*
- 57.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 3.82% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 90.62% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and SOXQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSCC and SOXQ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PSCC
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
SOXQ
-
Industrials
PSCC
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PSCC
SOXQ
Communication Services
PSCC
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
PSCC
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PSCC
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
PSCC
-
SOXQ
Utilities
PSCC
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
SOXQ
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.58 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 10.22 | -9.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.64 | 36.68 | -36.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -46.01% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -15.59% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -39.36% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -46.01% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.31% | -7.82% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -12.87% | +6.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 4.33% | +4.36% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 5.66%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 22.04%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 22.04% | -16.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.53% | 32.49% | -20.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 38.78% | -21.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 37.34% | -19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 37.24% | -17.91% |
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (22.04%) compared to PSCC (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 34.04% vs 1.40% for PSCC. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 34.04% return vs 1.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer