PSCC vs. RWR
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) and RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while RWR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.99%/yr vs 5.69%/yr for RWR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSCC charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RWR.
Performance
PSCC vs. RWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 12.79% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has outperformed RWR with an annualized return of 6.99%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 0.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.99%
RWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
PSCC vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 12.79% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 16.67% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 22.71% | -4.47% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and RWR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PSCC and RWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSCC vs. RWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCC
RWR
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCC
RWR
-
Basic Materials
PSCC
RWR
-
Industrials
PSCC
RWR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCC
RWR
-
Communication Services
PSCC
-
RWR
-
Energy
PSCC
-
RWR
-
Financial Services
PSCC
-
RWR
Healthcare
PSCC
-
RWR
-
Real Estate
PSCC
-
RWR
Technology
PSCC
-
RWR
-
Utilities
PSCC
-
RWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
RWR
PSCC vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 2.49 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 8.47 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and RWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -74.92% | +41.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -8.04% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -18.85% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -32.58% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -44.39% | +10.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.94% | 0.00% | -11.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -13.09% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.68% | 2.36% | +6.32% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 4.40%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 4.93% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 9.94% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.61% | 13.72% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 19.04% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 21.52% | -2.22% |
PSCC vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCC has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCC vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than RWR's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.97% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.27% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and RWR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to PSCC (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs RWR's -74.92%.
On 10-year performance, PSCC leads with 6.99% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCC has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCC.
RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.97% for PSCC.
PSCC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RWR is REIT. PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCC and 0.25% for RWR.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and RWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer