PSC vs. ROSC
PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - PSC tracks the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSC returned 8.77%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for ROSC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSC charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
PSC vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSC achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than ROSC's 16.64% return.
PSC
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 31.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 16.64%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
PSC vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 17.73% | 13.41% | 12.38% | 18.51% | -15.91% | 32.56% | 13.30% | 18.99% | -11.35% | 15.93% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 16.64% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -10.58% | 31.37% | 5.27% | 17.09% | -12.38% | 24.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSC and ROSC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PSC and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSC vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSC
ROSC
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PSC
ROSC
Financial Services
PSC
ROSC
Industrials
PSC
ROSC
Healthcare
PSC
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
PSC
ROSC
Energy
PSC
ROSC
Real Estate
PSC
ROSC
Basic Materials
PSC
ROSC
Utilities
PSC
ROSC
Communication Services
PSC
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
PSC
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSC vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
PSC
ROSC
PSC vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.52 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 14.75 | -3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSC vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than ROSC's maximum drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.69% | -43.13% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -7.75% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.49% | -23.74% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -23.74% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.33% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -7.18% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.37% | +0.48% |
Volatility
PSC vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that PSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSC | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 3.54% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 10.40% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 15.53% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.02% | 19.29% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 20.24% | +3.04% |
PSC vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSC vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ROSC's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.79% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSC and ROSC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSC dropped -46.69% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 5-year performance, ROSC leads with 8.95% vs 8.77% for PSC. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.57% for PSC.
PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSC and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer