PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSC vs. IG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSC vs. IG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSC

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.79%
YTD
13.84%
6M
13.56%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*

IG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.57%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSC vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PSC and IG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.82

PSC vs. IG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSC
IG

Technology

20.3%

-

Industrials

17.7%

-

Financial Services

16.5%
2.9%

Healthcare

15.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%

-

Energy

6.0%

-

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Technology

PSC
20.3%
IG

-

Industrials

PSC
17.7%
IG

-

Financial Services

PSC
16.5%
IG
2.9%

Healthcare

PSC
15.3%
IG

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSC
8.1%
IG

-

Energy

PSC
6.0%
IG

-

Real Estate

PSC
4.6%
IG

-

Basic Materials

PSC
4.2%
IG

-

Utilities

PSC
2.9%
IG

-

Consumer Defensive

PSC
2.3%
IG

-

Communication Services

PSC
2.2%
IG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSC vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSC
PSC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSC vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.55

PSC vs. IG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

-0.40

+0.90

Drawdowns

PSC vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSC drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSC and IG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-1.75%

-44.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.32%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-0.53%

-7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

PSC vs. IG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

4.90%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

4.90%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

4.90%

+18.40%

PSC vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IG's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSC vs. IG - Dividend Comparison

PSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IG's 0.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSC
Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF
0.58%0.67%0.75%0.73%1.92%1.45%1.25%1.47%1.30%0.95%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSC and IG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.

IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.58% for PSC.

PSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for PSC and 0.26% for IG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSC and IG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer