PSA vs. BMY
PSA (Public Storage) and BMY (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) are both stocks. PSA operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while BMY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, PSA returned 7.31%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BMY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSA vs. BMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSA achieves a 26.88% return, which is significantly higher than BMY's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 7.31%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.00% annualized return.
PSA
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 26.88%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
BMY
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.00%
PSA vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSA Public Storage | 26.88% | -9.69% | 2.09% | 13.60% | -20.20% | 66.63% | 12.69% | 8.96% | 0.62% | -2.89% |
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 8.27% | 0.11% | 15.81% | -26.14% | 18.98% | 2.88% | 0.41% | 27.74% | -12.90% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSA and BMY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1980 | 0.18 |
The correlation between PSA and BMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSA:
$57.34B
BMY:
$116.75B
PSA:
$10.84
BMY:
$3.57
PSA:
30.08
BMY:
16.02
PSA:
1.81
BMY:
0.91
PSA:
11.80
BMY:
2.40
PSA:
6.22
BMY:
5.82
PSA:
$4.86B
BMY:
$48.48B
PSA:
$2.95B
BMY:
$33.33B
PSA:
$3.38B
BMY:
$13.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSA vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank
PSA
BMY
PSA vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Public Storage (PSA) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 1.53 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 3.32 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSA vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSA drawdown since its inception was -60.19%, smaller than the maximum BMY drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA and BMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.19% | -72.03% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.20% | -12.05% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -36.85% | +11.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.93% | -47.67% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.93% | -47.67% | +9.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -17.79% | +11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.77% | -22.38% | +6.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 6.34% | +1.03% |
Volatility
PSA vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Public Storage (PSA) is 7.03%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that PSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSA | BMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 8.22% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.72% | 18.18% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 27.08% | -4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 24.02% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 25.29% | -1.83% |
Dividends
PSA vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison
PSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than BMY's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMY Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 4.38% | 4.60% | 4.24% | 4.44% | 3.00% | 2.36% | 3.69% | 2.55% | 3.08% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 2.17% |
PSA Public Storage | 2.76% | 4.62% | 4.01% | 3.93% | 7.55% | 2.14% | 3.46% | 3.76% | 3.95% | 3.83% | 3.27% | 2.62% |
Financials
PSA vs. BMY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Public Storage and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSA vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison
PSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 877.80M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
BMY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.07B and revenue of 11.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.
PSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 474.28M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.
BMY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.27B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.
PSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 529.38M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.
BMY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.68B and revenue of 11.49B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSA and BMY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMY has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to PSA (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSA dropped -60.19% vs BMY's -72.03%.
BMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSA and BMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer